Recommended scenario

Strict Priority

Best service protection with a Stage 6 score of 67.44. It combines utilization, priority compliance, and constraint compliance into one planner-friendly decision score.

Scenario Decision Cards

Each scenario is valid. The cards show what it is good at and what trade-off it makes.

Best overall outcome

Optimum Combination

Score 67.4
Decision score67.41
Utilization99.97%
Priority18.55%
Constraints100%
Advantages
  • No configured loading constraint violations were found.
  • Optimizes the combined business score across utilization, priority, and constraints.
Trade-offs
  • No major trade-off is visible from the available scenario metrics.
3 loaded SKUs21 pending
View Scenario
Best operational balance

Balanced

Score 67.4
Decision score67.37
Utilization99.62%
Priority18.79%
Constraints100%
Advantages
  • No configured loading constraint violations were found.
  • Balances truck fill with service priority in one practical plan.
Trade-offs
  • May not be the single best scenario on utilization or priority alone.
2 loaded SKUs22 pending
View Scenario
Best truck fill

Maximum Utilization

Score 62.5
Decision score62.54
Utilization99.99%
Priority6.35%
Constraints100%
Advantages
  • Uses truck volume better than the other available scenarios.
  • No configured loading constraint violations were found.
  • Focuses on filling the truck as much as possible.
Trade-offs
  • Can sacrifice some priority protection compared with priority-led scenarios.
8 loaded SKUs16 pending
View Scenario