Truck Utilization99.97%
Priority Compliance18.55%
Decision Score67.41
Constraint Compliance100%
Loaded SKUs3
Pending SKUs21
Volume and Score

7,93,04,519 cm3 loaded

27,959 cm3 unused from 7,93,32,477 cm3 truck capacity.

Why this scenario?

No configured loading constraint violations were found.
Optimizes the combined business score across utilization, priority, and constraints.

Trade-offs to review

  • No major trade-off is visible from the available scenario metrics.
Optimization Story

What this plan means

  1. LoadWise reviewed 22 candidate SKUs for V270 to V111 using TRUCK 1.
  2. Optimum Combination is recommended because it achieved 99.97% truck utilization and 18.55% priority compliance.
  3. The plan loads 3 SKUs and 122 units, leaving 21 SKUs and 770 units pending.
  4. Configured loading, compatibility, orientation, and heavy-on-light checks did not show violations.
  5. No high-priority pending SKUs were detected in this scenario.
  6. Refrigerator products consumed the largest share of loaded volume.
  7. This recommendation explains what to load and why; physical placement and loading sequence are not generated in this stage.

Constraint Impact Summary

Rule groups that affected loaded or pending products in this scenario.

Loading Rules18 SKUs

18 SKUs passed this rule group.

18 checks / 0 issues
Compatibility Rules0 SKUs

No active checks recorded for this scenario.

0 checks / 0 issues
Orientation Rules1 SKUs

1 SKU passed this rule group.

2 checks / 0 issues
Heavy-On-Light0 SKUs

0 SKUs passed this rule group.

1 checks / 0 issues
System Rules0 SKUs

No active checks recorded for this scenario.

0 checks / 0 issues

Scenario Review

  1. LoadWise reviewed 22 candidate SKUs for V270 to V111 using TRUCK 1.
  2. Optimum Combination is recommended because it achieved 99.97% truck utilization and 18.55% priority compliance.
  3. The plan loads 3 SKUs and 122 units, leaving 21 SKUs and 770 units pending.
  4. Configured loading, compatibility, orientation, and heavy-on-light checks did not show violations.
  5. No high-priority pending SKUs were detected in this scenario.
  6. Refrigerator products consumed the largest share of loaded volume.
  7. This recommendation explains what to load and why; physical placement and loading sequence are not generated in this stage.

Optimum Combination selected products to maximize the strongest overall trade-off between priority compliance and utilization while obeying active loading, compatibility, orientation, and system rules. It loaded 3 SKUs and left 21 SKUs pending. Loaded volume is 79304519 cm3 out of 79332477 cm3. Main pending drivers: 16 SKUs: product loading rule limit was reached. 5 SKUs: truck volume capacity was exhausted. No truck placement, loading sequence, 2D layout, or 3D layout is generated in Stage 4.