Recommended scenario

Strict Priority

Best service protection with a Stage 6 score of 84.85. It combines utilization, priority compliance, and constraint compliance into one planner-friendly decision score.

Scenario Decision Cards

Each scenario is valid. The cards show what it is good at and what trade-off it makes.

Best overall outcome

Optimum Combination

Score 83.7
Decision score83.68
Utilization99.99%
Priority59.21%
Constraints100%
Advantages
  • Uses truck volume better than the other available scenarios.
  • No configured loading constraint violations were found.
  • Optimizes the combined business score across utilization, priority, and constraints.
Trade-offs
  • Accepts a small trade-off on one metric when it improves the overall outcome.
13 loaded SKUs6 pending
View Scenario
Best operational balance

Balanced

Score 83.6
Decision score83.61
Utilization99.33%
Priority59.71%
Constraints100%
Advantages
  • No configured loading constraint violations were found.
  • Balances truck fill with service priority in one practical plan.
Trade-offs
  • May not be the single best scenario on utilization or priority alone.
13 loaded SKUs6 pending
View Scenario
Best truck fill

Maximum Utilization

Score 72.4
Decision score72.44
Utilization99.97%
Priority31.12%
Constraints100%
Advantages
  • No configured loading constraint violations were found.
  • Focuses on filling the truck as much as possible.
Trade-offs
  • Can sacrifice some priority protection compared with priority-led scenarios.
9 loaded SKUs11 pending
View Scenario