Scenario Details

Strict Priority

V275 to V478 / TRUCK 1
Download ScenarioRecommended PlanComparison
Truck Utilization94.28%
Priority Compliance99.55%
Decision Score97.53
Constraint Compliance100%
Loaded SKUs11
Pending SKUs1
Volume and Score

7,47,91,034 cm3 loaded

45,41,443 cm3 unused from 7,93,32,477 cm3 truck capacity.

Why this scenario?

Highest overall decision score for this run.
Uses truck volume better than the other available scenarios.
Protects priority demand strongly.
No configured loading constraint violations were found.

Trade-offs to review

  • No major trade-off is visible from the available scenario metrics.
Optimization Story

What this plan means

  1. LoadWise reviewed 12 candidate SKUs for V275 to V478 using TRUCK 1.
  2. Strict Priority is recommended because it achieved 94.28% truck utilization and 99.55% priority compliance.
  3. The plan loads 11 SKUs and 155 units, leaving 1 SKUs and 4 units pending.
  4. Configured loading, compatibility, orientation, and heavy-on-light checks did not show violations.
  5. No high-priority pending SKUs were detected in this scenario.
  6. Refrigerator products consumed the largest share of loaded volume.
  7. This recommendation explains what to load and why; physical placement and loading sequence are not generated in this stage.

Constraint Impact Summary

Rule groups that affected loaded or pending products in this scenario.

Loading Rules11 SKUs

11 SKUs passed this rule group.

11 checks / 0 issues
Compatibility Rules0 SKUs

No active checks recorded for this scenario.

0 checks / 0 issues
Orientation Rules3 SKUs

3 SKUs passed this rule group.

4 checks / 0 issues
Heavy-On-Light0 SKUs

0 SKUs passed this rule group.

1 checks / 0 issues
System Rules0 SKUs

No active checks recorded for this scenario.

0 checks / 0 issues

Scenario Review

Loaded SKUsPending SKUsConstraint ValidationOptimization Story
  1. LoadWise reviewed 12 candidate SKUs for V275 to V478 using TRUCK 1.
  2. Strict Priority is recommended because it achieved 94.28% truck utilization and 99.55% priority compliance.
  3. The plan loads 11 SKUs and 155 units, leaving 1 SKUs and 4 units pending.
  4. Configured loading, compatibility, orientation, and heavy-on-light checks did not show violations.
  5. No high-priority pending SKUs were detected in this scenario.
  6. Refrigerator products consumed the largest share of loaded volume.
  7. This recommendation explains what to load and why; physical placement and loading sequence are not generated in this stage.

Strict Priority selected products to maximize priority compliance while obeying active loading, compatibility, orientation, and system rules. It loaded 11 SKUs and left 1 SKU pending. Loaded volume is 74791034 cm3 out of 79332477 cm3. Main pending drivers: 1 SKU: category is missing. No truck placement, loading sequence, 2D layout, or 3D layout is generated in Stage 4.